|
Post by paula_m on Jul 3, 2009 11:06:22 GMT
ok who likes it who doesn't ?
|
|
|
Post by deezel on Jul 3, 2009 11:22:37 GMT
i like one but not the other
i'm more of a polo or t-shirt person
...hope that helps
|
|
|
Post by Supawooly on Jul 3, 2009 11:46:53 GMT
I think they're both 'norty word'ing shit.
|
|
|
Post by paula_m on Jul 3, 2009 11:48:16 GMT
don't hold it back ;D
|
|
T.A
Newbie
Posts: 12
|
Post by T.A on Jul 3, 2009 13:46:05 GMT
I think the home one looks like someone has Shat on one side. I'm not a fan of football shirts anymore anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Daley________________Lama on Jul 4, 2009 16:49:25 GMT
I think that the home one is absolutely wank, it really does look shit.
The red and white one is ok i guess but where does that come from, is there any red and white in your history?
|
|
|
Post by jonbury on Jul 4, 2009 17:06:58 GMT
Red and white stripes (or hoops) was one of our early home kits for a season or two i seem to remember reading on a website.
I wish they'd just put the new badge (which i quite like) onto a plain white shirt this season and had the brown and blue one as an away kit.
I believe the new goalkeepers kit is all white which could mean we sell more goalkeeper shirts than outfield player ones!
|
|
|
Post by hatedmyformername on Jul 6, 2009 15:56:12 GMT
Not a fan of the new badge at all. Give me the quiet dignity of the town crest over the tackiness of the V-shaped badge anyday.
|
|
|
Post by peterk on Jul 10, 2009 11:39:04 GMT
Both shite.
|
|
|
Post by fettler on Jul 18, 2009 14:55:02 GMT
They look a bit silly but I'm not too arsed as I don't have to wear one.
If the logos wash off expect a 200 post thread on the fishful bourd.
|
|
|
Post by paula_m on Jul 18, 2009 22:31:06 GMT
In the shop today so it seems & a few have posted on fishul site that it looks better than expected. phew!
|
|